FREE

This was the most read post on the “Free Wisconsin” blog last year.

It was posted Saturday, June 18, 2011 and was read by 2,898 people. The issue of mis-dated poll tape was not addressed by Tim Verhoff, whose opinion was the sole basis for the determination that Waukesha County Clerk, Kathy Nicholaus was innocent of any wrong doing in the Spring Supreme Court Election. She remains in her position today.

A slip of paper is the “deep throat” of the Supreme Court Election Fraud

It is peculiar how the smallest, most innocent, observation can become the “straw that breaks the camel’s back”.

Barb With was volunteering as an observer at the Waukesha recount when she made a glaring discovery. The poll tape that was being counted and matched for votes cast in the April 5 election for Supreme Court Justice was dated March 30, 2011. When she brought the suspicious date to the attention of election officials, they could not come up with any reason for the mis-dated poll tape.

Weeks later Barb appeared before the Assembly Committee for Election and Campaign Reform. This is a portion of her testimony:

An observer of the Waukesha County recount noticed such a small, innocent piece of paper that was spit out of a voting machine in Pewaukee. It was a poll tape from a voting machine on which is recorded your vote. But what caught her eye was the date at the top of the tape: 03-30-2011 or March 30. That was six days before the Supreme Court election of April 5!

I recall the face book messages in the group Election Integrity as she communicated the finding to the group. “Get a picture!”, and she did.

Probably a test?
Ok. You must admit this is well…..suspicious. Her first inquiries about what it was, what it was doing there, and how it came to be in the official recount material, was met with the response, “It was probably a test.” I guess this goes along with the “human error” defense of all that is Waukesha, but look the time stamp on the tape Mary spotted was: 01:40 a.m.!

I know there are dedicated election officials out there, but who would run a test of a voting machine in those wee hours of the morning? Can you imagine the scenario? A person leans over to his/her mate and says: “Honey, I can’t sleep. I’m going down to the Court house and do a quick test of the voting machines”.

No such machine in Pewaukee

The other explanation for the poll tape was something like, “There were no electronic votes cast in Pewaukee,” Response? “Oh. Ok. My mistake. I must not be seeing a poll tape from a voting machine that clearly says, “Pewaukee”. “I must change my medication.” Come on. If there are no such machines in Pewaukee, how did such a poll tape record materialize?

Trying to bury the photos

The people in the Election Integrity group have posted and shared the photos with friends, newspapers, and media and have found something fishy. The links and posts have been deleted from postings or reported to the face book admin as being “inappropriate”. Is someone pulling a “Scott Walker stealing all the papers from his College election” action? There seems to be an attempt to keep the photos out of view and the story hushed.

When this story was first shared on face book – 3:15 p.m. May 26 it was blocked.
The message below appeared on a Bloggers Link:

We are on to something……..????

Another Unanswered Question

To date, no one has come up with a plausible explanation for the poll tape that appeared during the recount process in Waukesha, not even the Government Accounting Board GAB (That is BAG backwards!) See GAB Behind the Curtain post.

So why hasn’t the GAB demonstrated some concern in the highly irregular March Poll tapes findings? It turns out that any questions about the integrity of the Wisconsin electronic voting system strikes deep into the heart and history of GAB Director Kevin Kennedy. Jim Mueller has been looking at the integrity of Wisconsin elections for many years, and had this to say about GAB’s Kevin Kennedy. “The fear is that these companies throw money around is such a way that we do not know that people who are in positions of trust have been compromised. Since the Accenture deal occurred, I haven’t felt good about Kennedy’s performance” The Accenture Deal Article By Mike McCabe November 26, 2004 Can you believe it? They want to privatize our highways, our university, our museums and now our elections. Egad! Kevin Kennedy, executive director of the state of Wisconsin’s Elections Board, signed a contract with a multi-national calling itself Accenture (it was part of Enron-tainted Arthur Anderson) to create “a total management package to run our elections.” Hello? See Bill Lueders’ column in Isthmus for the full, disturbing story, and then ask, What in the world is wrong with Kevin Kennedy?/

No public hearings were held on the outsourcing of our elections to a company–one that is based in Bermuda to avoid taxes in this country. When I called the Elections Board on Wednesday, I was told that it is, in essence, too late to complain because the contract has been signed. Really? Is it too late to fire Kennedy, appoint a new board, and cancel the contract? I don’t think so. Call the elections Board and demand that they cancel this contract. Believe it or not Mr. Kennedy, the citizens of Wisconsin are quite capable of managing our own elections. Kennedy’s Vested Interest Kennedy has a long history of chummy ties with the Accenture and Electronic Voting Systems. He pitched the system to the legislature. Do you really think he is going to be fair and impartial in answering questions about poll tapes?

The Brad blog has been investigating elections in the country for years, and this is what Brad has to say about the pesky poll tape.

“Worse, if the results printed on the poll tapes are the ultimate proof of the accuracy of results, what happens when — as discovered among poll tapes from the City of Pewaukee in Waukesha County late last week — the “recount” uncovers “Official Results Report” poll tapes dated a full seven days before the actual election was held?’

Prosser was the certified winner of the Supreme Court election and cast a deciding vote on the decision to end collective bargaining rights for workers and families in Wisconsin.

He was certified as the winner before evidence from the recall was published.

1) To date, the GAB has not published the court reporter minutes of the Waukesha recount.

2) The GAB has not published the number of total votes cast in the Supreme Court election.

3) The GAB will not acknowledge whether there is an on-going investigation of the events leading up to the “found vote” by Kathy Nickolaus. They cite the need for confidentiality since Kloppenburg filed a formal complaint. Confidentiality or hiding behind the curtain?

4) The GAB has never said what happened to Kathy Nickolaus’ private computer that held the official vote tabulation for Waukesha County.

5) The GAB has not explained why it gave Kathy Nickolalus “special software” to tabulate the Waukesha County vote.

The information for this post has come through intensive hard work and investigation by the people of the Election Integrity Group, many of whom have been advocating for fair “every vote gets counted ONCE” elections in Wisconsin for years.

Look at the Wisconsin SC Recount BALLOT / POLL TAPE Anomalies

A permanent, online web cache of photo stills revealing just *some* of the GLARING and ALARMING ballot “irregularities” recently seen during the STATE WIDE (VIRTUAL) HAND RECOUNT of the SUPREME COURT ELECTION, held on April 5th, 2011. The following was recently compiled through the collective efforts and shared documentation from many wonderful citizen observers from all over the Great Badger State of WI. The Election Integrity community commends them for all their diligence, tenacity and hard work, and thanks them for the important contribution it’s lending to *all* American Voters. This kind of real time photographic documentation of evidence in real time is, to our knowledge completely unprecedented. EI can use all the Facebook love we can muster…thanks!

The WI Citizens for Election Protecion will deliver a petition to the Government Accountability Board to demand a hand-count of the upcoming recall election votes. It is the Board’s current policy to dissuade clerks for counting ballots by hand. Help protect your vote.

Please sign petition link

Please share this. Please demand an independent investigation of the GAB and Kathy Nickolaus. Another election is right around the corner, just waiting to be stolen.

The Wisconsin ACLU mission As part of its mission to ensure the integrity of individual ballots as well as election results in Wisconsin, the Board continues its commitment to working with municipal and county election officials and local and statewide law enforcement agencies to prevent errors and opportunities for voter fraud and to detect and prosecute cases of illegal voting which may occur. ACLU—–207 East Buffalo Street Suite 325 Milwaukee, WI 53202 Phone (414) 272-4032 Fax (414) 272-0182 liberty@aclu-wi.org

Wis. GAB Office Hours: M-F, 7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Call us at (608) 266-8005 for general inquiries. Call our Help Desk at (608) 261-2028 for technical assistance. Call us toll-free at 1-866-VOTE-WIS E-mail us at gab@wi.gov or visit our G.A.B. Staff page for a directory. web mail GAB Send us a fax at (608) 267-0500.

Department of Justice E-mails to the Department of Justice, including the Attorney General, may be sent to AskDOJ@usdoj.gov. Department of Justice Main Switchboard – 202-514-2000 Office of the Attorney General Public Comment Line – 202-353-1555

Eagle Scout Walker waits for the next shoe to fall

In the meantime he expects the people of Wisconsin to trust him, after all, he was an eagle scout. Ok. Is this a Halloween trick? Just like the trick of campaigning for governor without bothering to mention that his agenda was to include curtailing collective bargaining, concealed carry, and vote suppression laws? Just like the trick of bringing the legislative agenda of the fringe, right wing, organization ALEC to the tables of the Wisconsin Assembly and Senate, often in the dark of night with little advanced notice?

The very first word in the scout law is trustworthy. Eagle Scout Walker expects trust when he never revealed his real agenda before becoming governor. He expects trust when he claimed that an end to collective bargaining was imperative to balancing the budget, but when questioned under oath he admitted the collective bargaining issue had nothing to do with the budget.He expects trust when a John Doe investigation swirls around his top aides and campaign donors?

If you were an eagle scout, which is questionable, then it is just as likely that David Prosser was your Scout Master. Is this some Halloween trick?

Now that the Recall Walker is slated to begin in earnest on Nov. 15 at the same time a John Doe investigation seems to focus on the same victim, we are left to wonder who will get there first, and Walker plays the “eagle scout” card?

What are we to expect in the coming months for Eagle Scout Walker?

The Blue Cheddar blog spells it out masterfully:

Walker has also proven he does not have the self-restraint to stop digging when he finds himself in a hole, so expect more cheating from him during the upcoming signature-gathering period and the eventual recall election. Here are a few predictions:

Expect covert Walker operatives to collect recall signatures with the intention of shredding them. Thousands of people who sign will never have their names turned in to the legitimate recall committee. Similarly, fake petitions will be circulated tricking citizens into believing they have signed a recall petition.

Expect the filing of at least one police report alleging that criminals are going door to door pretending to be recall volunteers but robbing or injuring people when they open their doors. The “criminals” will never be found, but expect wide-spread media reports to result, which will scare citizens away from signing petitions.

Expect emails to circulate telling people that Democrats are going to keep track of people who refuse to sign so they can punish them later.

Expect at least one mysterious fire, electrical surge, or burglary at the offices of organizations coordinating the recall efforts.

Expect Walker’s allies to accuse recall organizers of cheating when they themselves are caught cheating.

Expect Walker’s Republican party to force a primary election by running a fake Democrat if the real Democrats have only one candidate.

Expect draconian and confusing new voting rules that will discourage minorities, college students, senior citizens, and disabled voters from voting in the recall election. Oh, wait, we already have that.
Eagle Scout Walker Prepared to Earn Election Fraud Merit Badge

Expect the Walker campaign, through one of their front groups, to distribute mailings that list the wrong date for the election. Expect those mailings to go to Milwaukee addresses in primarily African-American neighborhoods.

Expect Kathy Nickolaus to be the last county clerk to report her vote totals.

Expect the Milwaukee County District Attorney and/or the U.S. Justice Department to indict Walker and/or his top aides soon.

And if anyone has a photo of Scott Walker wearing his Boy Scout uniform, with the Eagle badge, I’d love to see it. He says he earned it, but knowing his habit of stretching the truth, it’s more likely that he punched a Girl Scout and stole her cookie money.

Blue Cheddar Blog

Your message will be sent to Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov

Over 10,000 people signed a petition to investigate Waukesha County election results within two hours of Kathy Nickolaus “found” vote announcement.

After five months of investigation, the determination of the Government Accountability Board accomplished little to restore the confidence of voters in our election process.

Please sign the petition to request an investigation by the Department of Justice.

SIGN THE PETITION First Name Last Name Email The investigation concerning election procedures by the Government Accountability Board was published Sept. 28. The determination was inadequate in addressing many of the major concerns of Wisconsin voters hoping for relief from suspect and incompetent vote tabulation procedures that have deflated confidence of constitutional and democratic principles that are promised by law. The uncertain language of the determination did not rise to a level to provide relief from the documented anomalies that have risen from the election procedures in Waukesha County, including frequent breaks in the chain of custody of ballots, incompetency in managing computer programs and software, and counting votes from poll tapes dated before election day and from falsified copies of election report sheets. The recommendations of the report did not restore confidence in our elections. We are left with little assurance that our votes are fairly, accurately, or justly counted. We appeal to you to further investigate the these matters in a manner that will serve justice and restore integrity to elections in Wisconsin. SIGN NOW 39 signatures Share this with your friends:

Most recent Signatures

39. Brenda Gregory,  Oct 23, 2011
38. James Peterson,  Oct 23, 2011
37. James Peterson,  Oct 23, 2011
36. Dee Ives,  Oct 04, 2011
35. Mararet Street,  Oct 04, 2011
34. Linda Pfeiffer,  Oct 03, 2011
33. Paul DeBarbieri,  Oct 03, 2011
32. DEBRA HARTMANN,  Oct 03, 2011
31. Gretchen Kubeny,  Oct 03, 2011
30. Tina Congdon,  Oct 03, 2011
29. R Percey,  Oct 03, 2011
28. tom neale,  Oct 03, 2011
27. Cynthia Burkwald,  Oct 03, 2011
26. Marga Krumins,  Oct 02, 2011
25. Mary Jorgensen,  Oct 02, 2011
24. roger straw,  Oct 02, 2011
23. ELLEN LA LUZERNE,  Oct 02, 2011
22. Maxwell Raboin,  Oct 02, 2011
21. Naomi Rivers,  Oct 02, 2011
20. PEGGY JANECKE,  Oct 02, 2011
19. Debra Anderson,  Oct 02, 2011
18. JACKIE JANECKE,  Oct 02, 2011
17. Robb DeGreef,  Oct 02, 2011
16. Eric Mills,  Oct 02, 2011
15. Robert Ribbens,  Oct 02, 2011
14. Patricia Burlew Cox,  Oct 02, 2011
13. Phyllis Wendler,  Oct 02, 2011
12. janet jesberger,  Oct 02, 2011
11. mary lalime,  Oct 02, 2011
10. Margaret Street,  Oct 01, 2011
9. "Fighting" Bob Bergman,  Oct 01, 2011
8. Ann Stevning-Roe,  Oct 01, 2011
7. Aaron Agassi,  Oct 01, 2011
6. Pamela Wall,  Oct 01, 2011
5. bob gloede,  Oct 01, 2011
4. Maggie Thomas,  Oct 01, 2011
3. Jennifer Wilson,  Oct 01, 2011
2. Shaleen Culbert,  Oct 01, 2011
1. Dennis Kern,  Sep 30, 2011

10-5 / 1:00 p.m. – 54 Signatures!

Your signature will show up on the count ONLY if you confirm via email.
In any case your signing will send a copy of the petition to the DOJ Criminal Justice Department.

I will send a hard copy list of all signers along with most blatant evidence of election tampering via certified mail to the DOJ>

Waukesha County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus has been the subject of an on-going investigation since April.

Tim Verhoff, who was assigned to investigate Kathy Nickolaus has now completed his assignment and filed his recommendations with the Government Accountability Board. Melissa Mulliken, manager for the Kloppenburg campaign, announced back in July that she had been notified by attorney Tim Verhoff that he was following up on the complaint she filed with the Wisconsin Government Accountability Board. His work is complete.The next step is for the GAB to take further action based on his report. Six full months have passed since her press conference two days after the Wisconsin Supreme Court Election. Her “found” 14,000 votes in the City of Brookfeild excited national attention as one of the most bizarre turns in events in recent election history, and as a result, lead many to suspect foul play. Even though she apologized for the finding, calling it “human error”, the door was open for deep concern, suspicion, and demands for an immediate investigation. The GAB sent staff to Waukesha to investigate her vote tabulation process. Not long after that, the GAB itself was called into question since the board was alleged to have supplied her with unique software, not given to any other County Clerk in the State, to use for tabulating the vote, and of all things, on her personal lap top computer. More than 10,000 concerned Wisconsin citizens called for a bipartisan investigation by Attorney General JB Van Hollen in less than 48 hours. Rep. Tammy Baldwin (now candidate for Senator) wrote a letter to the Justice Department. From letter to Justice Department – Eric Holder “To ensure that the April 5 election for Wisconsin Supreme Court justice is free, fair and transparent, and to uphold faith in our democracy for ourselves and future generations, I ask for your immediate assistance in investigating these election inconsistencies in Wisconsin. Specifically, I urge you to immediately assign the Justice Department Public Integrity Section, which oversees the federal prosecution of election crimes, to investigate the questionable handling of vote records in Waukesha County, Wisconsin.”

As one of a handful of attorneys across the state of Wisconsin to be named to the prestigious “Rising Stars” award (originated by Law & Politics), Attorney Timothy R. (Tim) Verhoff defends people accused of crimes and drunk driving offenses. Outstanding Record Attorney Tim Verhoff began astounding people with his abilities during his secondary education, and graduated Summa Cum Laude, the highest recognition. His comprehension and quick-thinking skills were again recognized during his undergraduate degree from UW-Madison where he graduated Cum Laude, and once again affirmed when he earned his law degree and graduated with honors. Attorney Verhoff began his legal career as an assistant district attorney for Dane County. In short order, he graduated from trying low-level shoplifting cases to trying very complex murder, sexual assault and felony battery cases. criminal defense trial attorney In January 2011, Attorney Verhoff left the Dane County Prosecutor’s Office to further his passion for protecting the rights of people charged with criminal offenses. He joined Attorney Corey Chirafisi, and together they formed Chirafisi & Verhoff, S.C. outstanding results As was true for Attorney Corey Chirafisi, who had also served as a prosecuting attorney prior to entering private practice, Attorney Verhoff possesses a very unique advantage in criminal cases: he has tried every level of criminal case from the other side of the courtroom and possesses a unique insight into the prosecution’s legal strategies and methods. Felony & Misdemeanor Trial Litigation Attorney Tim Verhoff brings to each case a tremendously vast and in-depth knowledge of criminal case work and trial experience from thousands of cases ranging in degree from low-level misdemeanors and drunk driving charges to very complex multiple-defendant high-level felony cases.

We Need Answers

Director Kevin Kennedy and the GAB are on notice; pubic confidence in the Election process has been severely shaken.

We just witnessed how the appointment of the Special Prosecutor” Bradley to bring light to the choking incident in the Chambers of the Wisconsin Supreme Court lead to nothing more than casting an even darker shadow over the actions of Justice Prosser, who just happens to be the beneficiary of the found vote by Kathy Nickolaus! The long list of questions, anomalies, and new proof of election fraud surrounding the Waukesha recount must be answered. A real special prosecutor must be appointed to examine the mountains of evidence that resulted from the the Waukesha recount.

* Nickolaus dismissed an independent audit commissioned over concerns there are massive security threats in her current system. Nickolaus, who maintains a secret system for keeping public voting data, condescendingly laughed off the audit, drawing an irate reaction from the Waukesha County Board chair.

* Nickolaus was an employee of the Assembly Republican Caucus when Prosser was the Republican Assembly speaker, and she was one of two database experts for Assembly Republicans, spending 13 years becoming one of the state’s leading partisan experts on manipulating voter data.

* Nickolaus was in charge of developing a computer program that “averaged the performance of Republicans in all statewide races for the previous eight years in each ward and then averaged that information for each city, township, county and district.

* Nickolaus waited over 24 hours after the time she claimed she discovered the vote change before publicly reporting it. Two conservative media members reported the change prior to Nickolaus’s late afternoon announcement.

* Nickolaus withheld critical information from the the Waukesha Board of Canvassers. One member says Nickolaus invited her to be at the press conference, but had not given her a full picture of the problem. Also, Nickolaus curiously demanded the canvass begin on Wednesday instead of Thursday, and that the problem with the more than 14,000 additional votes were never brought up at the Wednesday or Thursday canvass by Nickolaus.

*Nickolaus was responsible for the vote tabulation in a county

-where she tabulated the votes for the Supreme Court election on her personal laptop with little or no transparency.

-where she tabulated the vote on special software provided by the GAB or, as has come to light more recently, the Department of Administration, which is subject of its own John Doe investigation.

-where the vote bags were open and “winged”, slit open with a sharp instrument and repaired with duct tape, and the numbers on the seal on the bags did not match the report sheets.

-where a poll tape was discovered and counted that bore the date of March 30 or six days before the election.

-where all of the bags, poll tapes, and election materials of the recount where stored in her office throughout the entire recount process.

-where statistical analysis suggests impossible anomalies in the low return vote of Democrats who voted in the presidential election and, who would have needed to switch parties in in the Supreme Court Election for Prosser to win.

We need answers

Do you want to know what election fraud looks like? Read on and you will discover real evidence before your very eyes.

You remember during the recount of the Wisconsin Spring Supreme Court election there was a lot of talk and pictures of unsealed and winged election bags?

Some bags appeared to have been slit with a sharp instrument were actually duct taped.Read “Duct Tape (Really?)”

Then there were the bags whose seal numbers did not match the numbers on the Inspectors Report. To protect the integrity of our elections your ballot is accounted for by numbering and recording where it goes, even after it is placed in bags. The bags are numbered and recorded on Inspector Reports. Whenever there is a discrepancy that points to an opportunity for a bag to be tampered with by adding or stuffing votes it is called a break in the chain of custody.

A host of these instances of break in the chain of custody where apparent in Waukesha County.

In each instance the observers for Kloppenburg challenged each and every one. Why was nothing done? The Wisconsin statutes give complete control of the means and rules for counting the vote to the County Clerk, who was Kathy Nickolaus. Since, Nickolaus had dismissed herself from the count, the head authority was give to retired Judge Mawdsley(pictured top holding bag). In each case it was his judgment that the votes be counted and any challenges to be dealt with later. As you may remember Kloppenburg conceded, the vote was certified by the Government Accountability Board, and the challenges where never officially addressed. It seems none of the challenges rose to real proof and could be dismissed as human error or mistakes. There wasn’t real proof of election fraud.

Until now.

From the Minutes of the Waukesha Recount – Town of Genesse

The Clerk, Barabar Whitmore, was present and tesitified The Kloppenburg representatives objected to counting …the bag tag and seal and label were different numbers than on the inspection report.The Board noted the the seal is 3165678, and the label and serial number is 3165678, but the inspector’s list is 3165679 = different number. It appears B. Hellman wrote a different number down.The Clerk addressed why the board has two copies of the statement with numbers on them. The second copy is somewhat incomplete, but does have a set of numbers that matches the ballot bags. The Clerk testifies that one is the original copy and one is a photo copy. The tag number and the voting number and the tamper evidence seal numbers were added to the copy. She thinks she made a copy for the town’s purposes, but did not make a copy of the back of one page that went to the County.

The ORIGINAL

The COPY

See full copies of “original” and “copy” of Inspection Report

So, the testimony is that the COPY was Changed to include the correct numbers.
You, most likely, viewed the two forms above and see that one is a copy of the other with the numbers changed, just as the observers did? Take another closer look.

It is NOT a COPY
You can see that indeed the numbers are added to the “copy” as testified in the minutes of the Waukesha recount, but look carefully. The “copy” is not a copy at all. It is an entirely different document.

This is what Election Fraud looks like.

In the “Original” the town is not circled, and the date is written as April 5. In the “Copy” the town is circled and the date is written as April 5th. The “Copy” is not a “Copy” as all, but a completely different document that was testified as being a “Copy” of the “Original”.

This is undeniable PROOF of Waukesha Election Fraud

This is like me signing your check with your name and saying “I made mistake.” Someone composed an entirely new and different Inspection Report and it was presented, judged, and counted as a “copy”. This is hard proof of Fraud.

Meanwhile – 14,000 “Found Vote” Problem Gets .00004% Fix

Why must progressives and the League of Women Voters, protest, fight, recall, blog, and file suite to illuminate what is an obvious partisan move of the GOP to suppress the vote?

6 Million For Vote Suppression…

MADISON – A new legal challenge to the Wisconsin Voter ID Law is coming. The League of Women Voters plans to file a lawsuit against Governor Scott Walker and GOP lawmakers, alleging the law is unconstitutional. The requirements involved in the Voter ID Law are among the toughest in the nation. That law goes into effect in 2012, but the League of Women Voters want to put an end to it now. Former Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Janine Geske (appointed to the Wisconsin Supreme Court by Governor Tommy Thompson in 1993) this lawsuit does have merit. “It’s certainly not a frivolous argument, and one of the reasons they are making those arguments is that under the federal Constitution, the U.S. Supreme Court says basically the voter ID requirement is OK, so they have to make their argument under the Wisconsin Constitution,” explained Geske. Geske believes, however, the suit will not go very far. Wisconsin is now the 11th state to have approved legislation requiring ID at the polls. Read Article

Meanwhile .00004% For Vote FRAUD

Why must progressives protest, fight, recall, blog, to get any answers about Waukesha County Clerk Kathy Nickolaus? But, oh, there is a mountain of circumstantial evidence to warrant a full investigation.

1) The post election meeting Prosser had with Walker to which Prosser has given three different responses on three different days: a) It didn’t happen b) I might have met him in the hall c) I don’t think I went to the Capitol that day. Which is the truth?

2) Walker’s response to the press when Prosser trailed by 200 votes, that a recount would be fair unless a bunch of votes turns up somewhere. One day later they did turn up in Brookfield. Was this a slip of revealing what he already knew?

3) The GAB announced that it was conducting an investigation of Kathy Nickolaus and her methods of counting the Waukesha vote, shortly after she made her “human error” public; the error that found 14,000 votes that put Prosser comfortably in the lead and ultimately the victor of the Supreme Court election. The latest update of progress on this investigation by the GAB, which was to be published by the end of June, is that they cannot acknowledge whether the action is on going or when, if ever, it will be complete, because the formal complaint by Kloppenburg has imposed new confidentiality restrictions that apply under state law and prevent any comment.

More evidence?

For more and more evidence of election fraud in Waukesha See “Election Merry-go-Round”

The Mickey Mouse Vote Fraud problem gets 6 Million Dollars for a fix. The Elephant in the Room Election Fraud problem gets no funding, little attention and after more than five months, no answers.

Election Fraud takes money and the kind of covert organization demonstrated by the activities of the Koch Bros. and their pet ALEC (American Legislative Exchange Council) to draft laws that will allow them to increase profits. One of these activities is to suppress the vote of groups that choose Democrats. Why do you think voter ID requirements have been imposed on, not only Wisconsin, but 10 other
states? Election Fraud requires recruiting, bribing or extorting people to tamper with electronic voting systems machines, hardware, and software. ALEC was created to covertly recruit legislators and people in powerful positions to write legislation, like the new voter ID laws. Do you see any similarities in the mode of operation of the two actions? Both are covert well orchestrated plans carefully designed and implemented to put conservative Republicans in power.

Vote Fraud, on the other hand, cannot be demonstrated to be a real problem that is influencing the outcome of elections in any significant way. So, why is all the money and attention going to correct this non-existent problem? The public hearings on the vote ID legislation provided a clear answer. The people who testified against the bill were representatives of seniors, the disabled, and people of color. Which party do you think most of these people are most likely to vote for? Yep. So it’s in the best interest of Republicans to keep them away for the polls, and they are spending 6 million dollars in poor “broke” Wisconsin to do just that.

Measures to prevent the non-existent Vote Fraud problem are really a masked effort to suppress the vote of groups who would vote Democrat.

Measures to ignore the Election Fraud problem is an effort to keep the mask on the vulnerability of electronic voting systems to prevent Democrats from winning elections. Bush v, Gore – Bush v. Kerry – Kloppenburg v. Prosser….

Pass it on and on and on……

The report is finally in. An extensive forensic investigation points to a massive block in vote circulatory system.

The diagram illustrates the following warning signs of this epidemic. Fortunately, it is only contracted by voters on election day who use electronic voting machines to cast their ballots.

Election employees on the State, County, Precinct level use the central tabulator to prepare ballot definition files for each precinct, and place them on memory cards (or packs). You can see the “central tabulator” box located just below the heart of the victim below. It is this “central tabulator that is programmed to count the ballots as victims either insert their ballot card into the touchscreen machine, and register their choices, or insert their filled out ballot into the optical scanner to be counted.

Victims Are Unaware of Blockage

The blockage is insidious in nature since it shows few symptoms and often goes undetected. A person is affected without even knowing it, as they show up (as demonstrated by following the green path of the diagram), present an ID, and are given a ballot. The the choice of the voter is printed out on a tape so they leave the booth with the assurance that all is well. They go home to watch the election returns feeling confident that their vote has been counted as it proceeded down the green path to the “Local Audit” and ends up as a recorded ballot with poll tape verification on the final memory card.

Here is what they don’t know.

The dangerous blockage is located in the central tabulator or the very heart of the victim. (as demonstrated red path on the diagram) You see the Central Tabulator has direct connection to the “optical Scanner or Computer” and to the Memory Card (CARD on diagram) in the heart of the victim. The red line of blockage flows from this Central Tabulator down to the final “Memory Card” at the bottom of the diagram and also all the way back up to “Secretary of State” – the final destination for official tabulation of the victim’s ballot.

Cause of the Blockage

These files, memory cards, or packs contain information about what candidates, races, and initiatives should appear on the ballot for each precinct. The directives for the election are computer software written by computer programmers. Not the County Clerk, the Secretary of State, the Governor, the Congress, or even the President of the United States have access to the programing language on these cards. There is no independent inspection of contents of these files or the cards!

These secret programs can be easily directed to flip votes from one candidate to another and have been shown in countless videos and demonstrations to be easily manipulated and hacked. Even Wisconsin Assembly Representative Pridemore openly admitted to the susceptibility electronic machine programs to hacking. Watch video where Pridemore admits machines can be hacked.

Would a Bernie Madoff Make You a Victim?

Now we know that neither the voter or election officials – the Government Accounting Board, County Clerks, or Governor have access to “secret tabulating software”held by Sequoia/Eagle (a dominant system in Wisconsin) or Diebold voting machines.

If corporations are a person, as defined by the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling, why are one or two unelected persons, with no public or private oversight, given total and complete control over the accuracy of vote tabulation in Waukesha, Wisconsin, and America? What if one of those “people” is a Bernie Madoff?
Read more “Vote Unconstitutional”

How to Avoid Becoming a Victim?

There is a movement to end this disease forever. You can join by simply giving your voice to the demand for hand counted paper ballots. The blockage disease is entrenched and reaching epidemic proportions, but you can be part of the cure by talking to your friends, neighbors about ending this senseless malady. Write to your editor, Assembly Representative, or State Senator to demand your 2012 election vote to be recorded on a paper ballot and counted by hand.

Nobody, and no machine, should be counting American votes in secret.

My Name is Alec. It is too late to stop me.

Check the date on the “Model Legislation” I wrote.

Elections Task Force on July 17, 2009.
Approved by the ALEC Board of Directors on August 27, 2009.

I’ve been quietly and secretly at work to steal the 2012 election for two years.

VOTER ID ACT SUMMARY This legislation requires any United States citizen[i] desiring to vote in a state to provide proof of identity at the polls, outlines permissible provisional ballots, and optionally[ii] provides for a free ID to those who do not have a driver’s license. SECTION 1……. You can read the rest if you like. Model Legislation But, why read the “model legislation” when you can read my law. It was just passed in your state. You see, the words are very nearly the same.

Yes. Way back when Governor Doyle and Fuss Feingold were in power, I was meeting in secret developing plans to take power in various state houses, like Wisconsin, to roll over you with legislation to suppress the vote. You must admit that it worked. My “model legislation” is now the law of the land in your state. The law is now on my side.

Wisconsin is Just Small Potatoes

About a dozen states are are actively considering legislation that would make voting much more difficult for college students, minorities, the elderly and the disabled. In some states, like Ohio, it is estimated that close to one million people would be affected by these changes. Read more about MY SUCCESS

Say it with me – “Close to a million”.

Reacting is Milking All Your Energies

You have just only discovered my plot to suppress the vote as article after article reveals my work of the past two years. Like this one:

ALEC’s efforts seem to be working. Out of the eight states that have legislators currently listed as members of the ALEC Public Safety and Elections task force, five are either considering or already have laws that were graded harmful to student voting. New Hampshire and Wisconsin, the two states currently considering the most extreme version of the law, both have ALEC members represented on the committees. And in Wisconsin, that member is Rep. Scott Suder (R-District 69), the state’s Majority Leader, who ushered the legislation through the Wisconsin State Assembly. That legislation includes provisions similar to the ALEC model legislation, which Campus Progress obtained from a source outside of ALEC. This copy shows that the model law was approved by the ALEC board of directors on Aug. 27, 2009. Read more Reactive Dribble

Feingold Sealed the Deal

The one obstacle to my success in Wisconsin was Russ Feingold. His announcement not to run for any office in 2012 was as unexpected as it was the greatest relief since David Prosser “won” the Supreme Court Election and sealed the deal to end collective bargaining.

The law is on my side. Your most hoped for candidate has bowed out, and I am inhaling the sweet smoke of victory.

Sin Searly

Alec

For immediate release;

The tabulation for recording the vote total in Wisconsin elections is a corporate secret.

Kevin Kennedy says that the GAB does not have software developers and uses the DOA for that with elections code. But wait a second the famous election software that Kathy Nickolaus, the Waukesha County Clerk who had an incident of either gross negligence or election fraud that flipped the Supreme Court Race for David Prosser (the Republican), was written by the GAB as previously reported by the GAB, right? Guess the GAB was less than honest as Kevin clearly said, they have no developers on board so contract with the Department of Administration (DOA). Read More

Way back on April 6 we learned that the Government Accountability Board (GAB) gave Kathy Nickolaus “special software” for her to use in tabulating the vote in Waukesha County.

This is the story in the Democratic Underground

Madison Wisconsin – “Breaking news today in the Prosser/Kloppenburg recount — as it turns out the software that Kathy Nickolaus used the night of the election was written specifically for her. Yes, I am not kidding you. Politiscoop for the last few weeks have been pressing the GAB to explain this. The Fix is on article we published on Sunday, 10 April 2011. Since then we have been asking for answers — we have even emailed the pdf of what we were sent and we have yet to receive an answer from the GAB. Could it be this new revelation played a part in Prosser appearing to have won the election two days before the votes were cast? — We still don’t know and we do not know why there has not been an answer given to us.”

And guess what? We still don’t know! The news that Kathy Nickolaus possessed and used this “made to order” software supplied by the GAB is not a suspicion or some urban myth. It comes from a reliable source you can read for yourself.

Today the website Milwaukee Buzz revealed that a through an open records request an email was sent to county clerks around Wisconsin. It stated the following:

The email, by Rusk County Clerk Denise Wetzel and addressed to other county clerks in Wisconsin, including Nickolaus, was sent on April 8, the day after Nickolaus revealed the vote-reporting error in a press conference. It reads, “Please note that the program Kathy uses IS NOT the new canvass reporting program that is in the (Statewide Voter Registration System) that we all have been using as of late. It is a completely different program that was created by GAB for Kathy to accumulate her votes prior to uploading them into the program that the rest of us use.”

Truth is…..NOBODY Knows!

Neither the voter or election officials – the Government Accounting Board, County Clerks, or Governor have access to “secret tabulating software”held by Sequoia/Eagle (a dominant system in Wisconsin) or Diebold voting machines.

If corporations are a person, as defined by the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling, why are one or two unelected persons, with no public or private oversight, given total and complete control over the accuracy of vote tabulation in Waukesha, Wisconsin, and America?

The President, Congress, and Senate as well as the Governors, legislators, and elected officials of every state are subservient to a few corporations regarding vote counting tabulation. For ten years we have taken their word that the vote machines, software, and tabulation devices are secure against mounting evidence by a host of organizations and private citizens, that the machines, software, and allegiances of the corporate players are highly suspect to the degree of trusting Bernie Madoff to handle your portfolio.

Sequoia, Diebold are (citizen united) citizens, who are not elected, appointed, or subject to oversight. They are allowed complete authority and full confidence with counting the vote in the United States of America. Why?

If wiki leaks is a matter of National Security deserving a full Federal Investigation, then why not VOTE Leaks. If there was ever a threat to National Security greater than secret vote count tabulation, what could it be?

If ever there was a practice that is more unconstitutional at first glance, than giving vote tabulation results to a few single (Citizens United) people with no oversight, what could it be?

The date and time of the press conference has been going on for more than ten years. For more details and pictures, demand an immediate investigation of the Waukesha tabulation of the vote in the Spring Supreme Court Election.

Did you think the role of a Special Prosecutor was to prosecute?

Seems that DA Bradley of Sauk County missed the point in, once again, letting David Prosser off the hook.

She was not appointed as a Special District Attorney; to determine whether a case should be brought to trial, but a Special Prosecutor to bring forth evidence to Prosecute David Prosser for a physical attack in the workplace that would have gotten any other worker in any other work place fired. I’m no lawyer but when a Special Prosecutor was appointed, I was relieved that the wrong doers would finally come to trial, and was shocked at her unwillingness or inability to take the matter to court. After weeks of investigation, and interviews, why is the decision to prosecute this outrageous behavior in Wisconsin’s highest court left in the hands of a single County District Attorney acting as Judge and Jury?

How to Unseat Prosser

What hangs over David Prosser like a choke hold, is all of the suspicious allegations surrounding his whereabouts, role, and actions over the past months, that have been covered up, dismissed, or ignored in a way that leads to the question: Who is protecting him? Who is hiding what…and why?

Apparently, friends in high places are about to push another instance of this man’s irrational and highly questionable behavior under the rug. How else can one explain his escape from any punishment for actions, that you or I would be dismissed, demoted, or fired for?

The Dominos Will Fall

Clearly, this man needs to be sanctioned, charged, and unseated, but relying on the people in high places promises to be a dead end. Yet, the original sin remains under investigation. He retained his seat on the court through an election that resulted in a recount and an association with one, Kathy Nickolaus who “found” him the 14,000 votes to hold his seat. Documented evidence of election fraud was observed, reported and documented during the recount. It is here, back at the beginning, back with the evidence surrounding Kathy Nickolaus and the Spring Supreme Court Election, where the path to unseat Prosser can be found.

Here, under the Election Fraud rug,

lies the evidence just waiting to be revealed to the light. You see, it never has been. This evidence is not in the hands of the people in high places. It is in the hands of ordinary concerned citizens who volunteered time, energy, and analysis to observe and document it.

The path to unseat Prosser is not to empower the people in high places…but to empower the people by exposing the evidence they gathered.

The privileged and powerful are protected and play by different rules than the citizens they serve.

The GAB, Sheriff’s Department, or Judicial Commission need only announce that they are conducting an “investigation” and the suspects are off the hook. Any inquiries, or questions for detail are simply met with a “no comment the matter is under investigation”. This secrecy would not be held if you attacked someone in your work place, or if your child were caught cheating on a test. Why are the privileged and powerful granted a special privilege of secrecy that you or I would never get?

But, oh, there is a mountain of circumstantial evidence to warrant a full investigation.

1) The post election meeting Prosser had with Walker to which Prosser has given three different responses on three different days: a) It didn’t happen b) I might have met him in the hall c) I don’t think I went to the Capitol that day. Which is the truth?

2) Walker’s response to the press when Prosser trailed by 200 votes, that a recount would be fair unless a bunch of votes turns up somewhere. One day later they did turn up in Brookfield. Was this a slip of revealing what he already knew?

3) The GAB announced that it was conducting an investigation of Kathy Nickolaus and her methods of counting the Waukesha vote, shortly after she made her “human error” public; the error that found 14,000 votes that put Prosser comfortably in the lead and ultimately the victor of the Supreme Court election. The latest update of progress on this investigation by the GAB, which was to be published by the end of June, is that they cannot acknowledge whether the action is on going or when, if ever, it will be complete, because the formal complaint by Kloppenburg has imposed new confidentiality restrictions that apply under state law and prevent any comment.

More evidence?

For more and more evidence of election fraud in Waukesha See “Election Merry-go-Round”

If you want to unseat Prosser demand the circumstantial evidence gathered during the Supreme Court Recount be addressed. Tell a friend. Tell an editor. Only the people will unseat Prosser.